Proof of existence is provided by the simple phrasing of the question; by thinking it, you have provided existence - by writing it, the proof.
A lot of people are overcomplicating such a simple concept. ;-)
English
-
Lolno
-
Lol, yes. :-p Honestly, what would you accept as "proof" of existence? For example, if you're thinking about something, you have brought that "something" into existence merely by thinking about it. Having a conversation provides oral & audio proof, whether you believe it's illusory or real. Touching something provides physical proof that it's tangible, regardless of mental state; belief of physical interaction makes that interaction real, thus existence is proven. Does that make sense to you? Proof of existence is relatively simple with no constraints to the experiment. :-) Concerning your hashtag, definitely firm, since that means you have their attention. :-p
-
[quote]With no constraints[/quote] But there are. We can play hypotheticals all day, but in the end they are just tales to pass the time.