{{
`${userDetail.user.displayName}${userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode ? `#${standardizeBungieGlobalCode(userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode)}` : ""}`}}
{{getUserClans()}}
Edited by Lolipops:
2/25/2015 9:11:56 PM
7
Remasters
[spoiler] Great video by Totalbiscuit. [/spoiler]
With the release of Homeworld Remastered Collection, it got me thinking...
How much of an improvement needs to be made before you even considering purchasing a 'remastered' game?
Personally for me, if it has not improved much, then I stay clear. Unless it's a game that I can't normally get easily. Such as Grim Fandango or Homeworld.
So, what are your thoughts?
-
2 RepliesEdited by Smarkdow: 2/25/2015 8:51:39 PMIt depends. When the MGS HD Collection released, I was all over it. Aside from me being a Metal Gear fanboy, it was enticing mainly because of the opportunity to finally play Peace Walker (didn't have a PSP), and the performance upgrades the games received (MGS3 at 60 fps? Yes please). And the art book that came with the collection was a nice bonus. With Resident Evil HD, I don't know what was changed or upgraded besides the resolution and controls. And I still play on 4:3 and use the original tank controls. So, there's not much that really changed, but I still purchased it because I love the game regardless and I don't regret it one bit. On the other hand, there are some remasters I absolutely will not consider, like the Silent Hill HD collection. Barring the numerous technical issues, Konami saw fit to redo the voice acting, which is a big no no in my book. So, I guess it juat depends on what game is being remastered and if I really want to play it again.
