{{
`${userDetail.user.displayName}${userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode ? `#${standardizeBungieGlobalCode(userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode)}` : ""}`}}
{{getUserClans()}}
Edited by EwCringe:
12/10/2015 9:13:53 PM
1067
Official Star Wars Thread / Ask Me Anything About Star Wars
P.S. Any other EU fans out there?
Edit: If you have another question after the first, just post a whole new reply to this post because my notifications are uncooperative.
Edit 2: Wow! Some of you have clever and difficult questions. So far the most frustrating is, "Who shot first?"
Edit 3: Feel free to help other people if I don't get to them. Have fun!
[b]WOOHOO 1000 POSTS[/b]
2627 posts... Damn...
Edit 4: Too many questions. Systems overload. Cool down required before response sequence can be reinitiated.
-
14 RepliesAs you may already know, Disney currently has an animated show called "Starwars Rebels" In said animated show, there is a character called the Inquisitor. The inquisitor is undeniably a sith. And this show takes place before the events of episode 6. Before the end of episode 6, Darth Vader and Darth Sidious were the two primary sith. Now if we look back into official StarWars lore, we see that the sith lord "Darth Bane" created the rule of 2, which stated only 2 sith could reside at one time. A master and an apprentice. The apprentice would have to kill the master to gain power. Now if the tv show takes place before episode 6, then how is it possible for the Inquisitor to exist? Darth Vader and Sidious already meet the requirement for the rule of 2. The Inquisitors existence is against the ideals of the sith. Just a little something that bothered me.
