>2015
>people still can't accept that religion is a belief
>people still can't accept that atheism is a belief
Neither are confirmed to be true or false. Just don't shove your belief down other peoples throats, and don't let other people influence you otherwise.
English
-
Holy hell, 19 replies
-
Lack of belief is different to a belief. Atheism=/acknowledgment of evolution
-
Lack of is not possession of.
-
I believe in stuff. BUT I LOVE HOW YOU PUT THIS DOWN!!!!!!
-
THANK YOU [i]SO MUCH[/i]
-
Whoa whoa whoa! Who said anything about religion?
-
Since when did evolution become an atheism thing? Are gravity and electromagnetism also atheistic ideas, because they are part of scientific theory.
-
Evolution is a fact not a belief
-
Edited by d 6d7565727465: 3/10/2015 12:01:11 AMI can't even. If, [b]if[/b] you believe this mean God isn't real, there is a number of people who believe that God used evolution as a tool. But I suppose we won't really know for thousands of years...
-
You can't prove god isn't real so I don't know where you got that from. You said don't shove my beliefs down your throat, I just pointed out that evolution is a fact, it does not require faith.
-
Exactly. No one can prove God. No one can disprove God. Since you're certain it is fact, why are primates still around? I thought when a species evolved, the past version is pretty much scrapped. I'm only curious. Besides, I said [b]if[/b].
-
Monkeys did not evolve into humans, that's why they exist. They species that evolved into monkeys doesn't exist anymore, neither does the species that evolved into modern people.
-
Not monkeys like capuchin or something, primates. Gorillas, chimpanzees, etc
-
Edited by ShpadoinkleBeks: 3/10/2015 5:27:33 PMThey all still exist because they simply had better body structures to stay in the forest. Why change a perfect body structure tailored to your environment? Its also why crocodiles have barely changed. Not every animal in a species evolves. Only the ones who were able to diverge and give new genes. The others still have survived long enough to be part of their environment so why not keep a good thing going? Overpopulation could drive some animals in a species to new places and make new adaptions creating new species, but still leaving the original one intact.
-
Yes and we share a common ancestor with them and they branched off into their own line. We did not evolve from them.
-
Aaaand you lost me.
-
Are you questioning why orangutans, gorillas exist?
-
I-I think i'm too dumb.
-
It could be a belief.
-
The belief doesn't change the fact.