{{
`${userDetail.user.displayName}${userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode ? `#${standardizeBungieGlobalCode(userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode)}` : ""}`}}
{{getUserClans()}}
3/17/2015 2:06:34 PM
16
You have no absolute proof of this. You might have what you think is supporting evidence but you cannot say this is a fact.
English
-
When was the last time you took a picture with God What was that?? Oh never....
-
Why are you relating my religion to this? I never said shit about God being a fact known to science. I believe God is real but I don't say it's related to science like some do with Macroevolution.
-
I must of replied to the wrong post. Cuz honestly I didn't even read yours
-
-
Well, there goes gravity and electromagnetism and the nuclear forces and medicine and engineering and chemistry and astronomy and everything ever.
-
All of those are observed. Macroevolution has never been observed.
-
And when was the last time anyone directly observed an electron? (It was never).
-
We have seen it in action. We observed its actions even though we cannot see it. We have never seen one bit of shit on macroevolution.
-
http://www.actionbioscience.org/evolution/irwin.html
-
Microevolution sure. All the stuff about macroevolution is just assumed because of similarities which doesn't prove it's real.
-
You read the thing about speciation, right? If two populations of organisms cannot interbreed successfully, they are separate species. This has been observed in California with salamanders.
-
http://www.scientificamerican.com/article/15-answers-to-creationist/
-
That doesn't even explain it's inference (not observation). You can't say "all this evidence shows this" without even explaining what the evidence is. A theory can be observed, like gravity. The theory of Macroevolution has not been observed. Even if what you think is evidence is pointing toward your theory you cannot just assume that it is evidence for your theory. Some of his evidence is dependent upon how old things are. There is no proof of things being millions and billions of years old. You can only use so called "evidence" for it. I believe a world wide flood happened. Here is my evidence for it. Ocean fossils on top mountains and the way sedimentary lairs are placed on the ocean and in the grand canyon There is also evidence of fossils with food half way up their mouths meaning they were crushed in an instant and not by gradual time of a million years. However I cannot say that it is a fact because non of us were there to see it.
-
It has been observed in animals with very small live spans, over a couple of years the species changed into something more suitable for its environment and could not mate with the original species making it a new species entirely. Lizards in California branched off and after many many years the most recent species in each branch could not breed with each other. The adaptations on a species caused by the environment accumulate over time resulting in a different species. Its an observed fact.
-
This is micro evolution within a species of adapting and interbreeding, which I believe in. It has [b]not[/b] been observed that monkeys evolve into humans. Two totally different subjects.
-
That's because monkey don't evolve into people, we have a common ancestor with them. Millions of years ago a species of ape branched off, one group after millions of years became monkeys, the other eventually became humans after millions of years of adaptations. Micro and Macro evolution is the same thing. Micro is all of those adaptations over a small period of time, in macro all of those adaptations eventually result in a different species after a much much longer period of time.
