That doesn't even explain it's inference (not observation). You can't say "all this evidence shows this" without even explaining what the evidence is. A theory can be observed, like gravity. The theory of Macroevolution has not been observed. Even if what you think is evidence is pointing toward your theory you cannot just assume that it is evidence for your theory. Some of his evidence is dependent upon how old things are. There is no proof of things being millions and billions of years old. You can only use so called "evidence" for it. I believe a world wide flood happened. Here is my evidence for it. Ocean fossils on top mountains and the way sedimentary lairs are placed on the ocean and in the grand canyon There is also evidence of fossils with food half way up their mouths meaning they were crushed in an instant and not by gradual time of a million years. However I cannot say that it is a fact because non of us were there to see it.