It would be nice if we could choose only singles or only 6-person fireteams as an option for matchmaking. I've been on both sides of that type of match and it rarely feels balanced and is often over quickly.
-
Skill based matchmaking and a ranking system would fix so many problems with this game. How did they not put this in when it was in a game they released 10 years ago?!
-
I thought there was an update they already did that made it more likely for pre-made fire teams to face other pre-made fire teams.
-
Mercenary mode is what we need.
-
IDk about being able to select off it, but Matchmakign SHOULD prioritize party size second after connections. If a group goes in with a group fo 6, they should at least being playing 2 groups of 3 each on nearly every match if the playerbase is there to make it happen.
-
As they should
-
Thats the whole point of TEAMS. Teamwork.
-
Everyone in this forumn should be using the team chat option..you know the one everyone cried about. Communicate.
-
I would love to see more variety in playlists especially a no super and playlists for control/clash with no 6 person teams.
-
Who woulda thunk that communication is key to success? Crazy talk!
-
And how often do you come across them? Almost never and when you do, you can go to orbit after the match and not see them again.
-
Organized 6-man teams should win. They have mics to communicate, and usually know what they're doing. If you don't like 6v6, go play rumble or skirmish.
-
That there is in all games.
-
Rumble...?
-
Sounds like a good idea. I dont play much crucible and dont pretend to be good. I only really play for the exotic bounties. But ive been smashed by whole teams before which would really make it boring for both sides.
-
i think it really depends. Sometimes the 6 man fireteams are pretty bad. I had a decisive victory with randoms against a 6 man team all using the Vex in IB. I also had a match against a 6 man team that quit after about 2 minutes giving us an easy win.
-
Would be fun
-
Yeah mercenary mode would be a cool addition to the game for players just playing by themselves who don't want to deal with full fireteams
-
Man the only thing they need to fix is the constant lag everything else is fine with me. my winning rate is only 51% but idc cause I usually have the highest kill.
-
Well, I'm not going to stick around if we're getting slaughtered. I look for fireteamed groups, when I run solo, and will intentionally dip out before the match starts. I like a match that's somewhere closely balanced, not some anal fist-blam!- festival.
-
No knock it off. You're gonna ruin pvp for everyone. It depends on the fire team. I've been solo and taken out full fire team with other solos. And vice versa.
-
Edited by Silvurphlame: 3/30/2015 1:19:30 AMIt's called Team [i]Voice[/i] Channel. (Left out part of the name.)
-
This was a huge problem in Iron Banner too. I wouldn't mind your suggestions. Would even the playing field. By the way, how can you tell when your up against a Fireteam before the match starts?
-
Yes. In Iron Banner we'd have a look at our opponents and 100% of the time we'd reck them if they were all solos or a few teams of 2. We'd be pushed harder with anyone team of 6, but it's literally 100% of the time that we'd absolutely smash the solos to the point it got boring. It's mostly due to communication - we'd shout out '2 going B', '3 on a', 'one-shot on B', etc etc. I agree there should be a solo mode and fireteam mode.
-
You have some serious guts for posting something this stupid. Get over it. It's just a game. Everyone loses in something once in awhile.
-
Bump.
-
You're crushing them, send them to the forums crying!