Notice how I said [i]fooled[/i]. So, yes you are technically right, they had no choice.
But I also know, biologically speaking, that humans can only reproduce by converging sperm and egg. So I don't think the human body would "just be gay" since it wouldn't allow continuation of the species, its not natural.
No hate here, I just speak the truth, as hard as it can be to accept.
Good day sir!
English
-
Also, the majority of people one the world are strait, you know. So it wouldn't have mattered, even back then.
-
It is a genetic disorder. Also, there is homosexuality in nature you know.
-
It's not a genetic disorder... It [i]is[/i] biological [i][b][u]and[/u][/b][/i] environmental.
-
Environmental? Where'd you get that from?
-
Homosexuality is a behavior. Behaviors are derived from the environment one is in and their biological make up.
-
You did not explain how it is environmental. Saying that it is environmental is supposing that the environment has something to do with it. Also, isn't their genetics also a part of their biology?
-
I'm not sure what you're asking me to explain. The environment being involved is pretty straight forward, -- unless of course, you're an idiot. The environment includes one's home, school, culture, and their family. [quote]Daryl Bem, a social psychologist at Cornell University, has suggested that the influence of biological factors on sexual orientation may be mediated by experiences in childhood. A child’s temperament predisposes the child to prefer certain activities over others.[/quote] http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/science/science-news/10637532/Being-homosexual-is-only-partly-due-to-gay-gene-research-finds.html Also, just because it is genetic, doesn't mean it's a disorder.