Seriously, insulting your opponent is the only sensible come back you could come up with? How elementary of you, and I thought you were going to say some clever, overall opinion upon your position. Well, whatever...

Seriously, what is there to say? Ken Hamm is a con artist, just like Ray Comfort and the others. And besides, what possible constructive conversation can we have if you take Ken Hamm's word? Look at how he ends that. No amount of evidence will ever sway him on anything. I naturally assume you will be the same way if you look up to him. If that's true, then why should I waste my breath? Let's also be honest about what any of those "debates" are really about. A scientist shows up attempting to dispel misconceptions about scientific ideas that get used as strawmen by the religious. The other guy isn't there to actually discuss anything though, [i]but merely promote to his intended audience how well he's fighting the "enemies" of their faith.[/i] It's a dog and pony show at best.

Glad you watched, and then again not for I have no idea why we have lowered our conversation about dogs and pony shows. I thought it was better than child's explanation of evolution. Guess I was wrong... Not.