It really isn't a debate, evolution is a fact. Its not subject to belief or disbelief, its reality. A scientific theory is a proven hypothesis. Evolution is a theory, just like Gravity, and Cells are "just a theory". Micro and Macro evolution are fake concepts invented by creationists in order to debunk it. Clearly, that did not work. Evolution has been directly observed in animals with short lifespans like fruit flies. If you are going to reject direct, peer reviewed observation, yet trust in the bible, or the Qur'an or any holy book. You are creating a double standard. The burden of proof is on us, and it has been met time and time again.
Edit: Wow 2000 replies that's awesome
Edit: I really love the responses, I can't believe we're over 3000
Edit: I'm gonna rewrite this post as I don't like the message it is portraying and some of the feedback it has received. I just don't personally like how it was wriited and the circumstances it was written in check back in a couple hours for the new one.
-
Edited by SSG ACM: 4/30/2015 4:58:49 AMEvolution is neither a fact nor a scientific law. It is a theory based on a hypothesis born almost 2000 years ago. It's a theory, and the Law of Thermodynamics is that, a law that can be hypothesized, experimented, observed, and concluded. Both terms can't coexist because their logic conflicts. Evolution can only be hypothesized; thus, it can't be considered a fact without repeatable experimentation and observation. Another thing, let's all assume Evolution is true. Let's say that in the assumed scenario, some creature is presently evolving. Let's say a fish was developing an extra leg so that it's future generation would have to walk on land. What will happen to the fish? Being that the creature is no longer stream lined, it will become a product of another evolutionary phrase, "Survival of the Fittest," in which only the physical fit survive. Since the creature is at a physical disadvantage, it is not only likely that it would be rejected among its kind for procreation, but it would also be endangered by the carnivorous higher beasts that feed off of that kind; thus, evolution is apparently a contradictory fact in it of itself (where two terms acclaimed to be true are apparently contradicting each other when there poorly seen by evolutionists as logical proof).