{{
`${userDetail.user.displayName}${userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode ? `#${standardizeBungieGlobalCode(userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode)}` : ""}`}}
{{getUserClans()}}
5/3/2015 3:12:37 AM
1
The assumption that evolution is completely true is faulty in of itself. I never said that it wasn't true at all, I just said that to base something off of a theory/law/whatever is the definition of biased, no matter how much evidence it has for it.
English
-
Edited by Britton: 5/3/2015 3:14:53 AMWhen the theory or law is a theory or law then your being biased towards the truth. And you're in school to learn the truth. Not everything but the truth.
-
You're not being biased if it is something proven 100% true. Evolution hasn't and probably will never be proven 100% true. So hence it is biased.
-
Nothing can be proven 100% true. Welcome to philosophy.
-
At least we agree on something. I really don't want to argue and debate for hours, because between you and me we surely could, so let's just agree to disagree because we are probably never going to have the exact same philosophical ideas. You are a good dude who knows what he's talking about, and in my opinion, so am I. And neither of us are getting anywhere with each other.
-
Sure. But you should be smart enough to know basic geology disproves a global flood.
-
I just copy and pasted, man. I didn't even know that was in there. I just read some of them, copied, and pasted. The truth is I was just trying to get some of them, but something happened and all of the ones listed copied and pasted and I didn't have time to go back and delete the ones I don't agree with.
-
*shrugs* The only opinion I can form of you is based on how you present yourself here.
-
Very true.
