I am simply following Occam's Razor, a principle created to solve problems. It essentially states that between two principles that hold up equally well, the one with the least assumptions should be considered more correct.
We don't know anything to be completely true. There are an infinite amount of possibilities in the universe. There is the possibility that I am a figment of your subconscious mind. There is another possibility that I am a computer program. Therefore, we should hold nothing to be true.
In that case, we should trust the 'reality' with the least assumptions. The more we base our theories on reality on our observations, the more they should be trusted. If we [i]assume [/i]something to be true, it is not backed up by evidence, but can be equally logically sound.
Your role as a moderator enables you immediately ban this user from messaging (bypassing the report queue) if you select a punishment.
7 Day Ban
7 Day Ban
30 Day Ban
Permanent Ban
This site uses cookies to provide you with the best possible user experience. By clicking 'Accept', you agree to the policies documented at Cookie Policy and Privacy Policy.
Accept
This site uses cookies to provide you with the best possible user experience. By continuing to use this site, you agree to the policies documented at Cookie Policy and Privacy Policy.
close
Our policies have recently changed. By clicking 'Accept', you agree to the updated policies documented at Cookie Policy and Privacy Policy.
Accept
Our policies have recently changed. By continuing to use this site, you agree to the updated policies documented at Cookie Policy and Privacy Policy.