In the Grand Canyon, there are layers upon layers of fossils. You don't see any of these fossil layers overlapping or mixing together. They are very distinct. If there was a great flood, you would expect these animals to swim up, towards the surface. But you don't see that, you see that they are settled very specifically. Pangea is a very well supported idea. I don't doubt Pangea at all. Those fossils could just be the remains from millions of years ago, before those mountains gained height due to plate tectonics. They could have been underwater and fish died there before the mountains rose. The collision with Asia and India, which sparked the Himalayas is known to have happened only 55 million years ago, sea life was abundant at that time period.
Your role as a moderator enables you immediately ban this user from messaging (bypassing the report queue) if you select a punishment.
7 Day Ban
7 Day Ban
30 Day Ban
Permanent Ban
This site uses cookies to provide you with the best possible user experience. By clicking 'Accept', you agree to the policies documented at Cookie Policy and Privacy Policy.
Accept
This site uses cookies to provide you with the best possible user experience. By continuing to use this site, you agree to the policies documented at Cookie Policy and Privacy Policy.
close
Our policies have recently changed. By clicking 'Accept', you agree to the updated policies documented at Cookie Policy and Privacy Policy.
Accept
Our policies have recently changed. By continuing to use this site, you agree to the updated policies documented at Cookie Policy and Privacy Policy.