[quote]Okay, I'm confused about evolution. What type of evolution are you talking about?[/quote]Micro and macro-evolution, and it's cyclical processes.[quote]The First Law of Thermodynamics says, "Energy can't be created nor destroyed." I understand that evolution came from a singularly, but I was reading an article last night, and it said that they don't know where all of the energy came from.[/quote]Everything we know that exists (without experimentation) has a cause, and every cause has an effect. Whenever any energy is put into a system, it has to have a source, and that source has apparently always existed before the "evolution," if you will, of that cause. The problem is that there is an unexpected level of difficulty to explain that isolated system's source. Whether one explains that it is by the radiation of celestial bodies, the existence of black holes and dark matter, or the vacuum of space, each has an apparent origin but no explanation as to their own existence.[quote]Like the second law, things tend to break down. Evolution is adding genetic information to the thing, but the second law contradicts it?I'm confused in understanding the logic. Can you explain?[/quote]The problem is that evolution causes biology to evolve into an alternate or new species in order to cope with the changing environment, yet it has no explanation to existence of Earth's biology in the first place when life supposedly began on barren, non-organic Earth. It's a paradox that has no explanation since there is no explanation as to the existence of the cause. As in the original post, it explained it nicely, and as illustrated in the Laws of Thermodynamics, it contradicts the existing philosophy that evolution is true (an atheistic truth without a cause).