[quote]...but evolution isn't a prediction...[/quote]Agreed. It's a fallacy since it's speculated areas possess no evidence.[quote]...its a conclusion on the observed evidence.[/quote]NEWSFLASH: You can't observe evolution. A rock is still a rock, and an amoeba is still an amoeba. I like to see those two to make something more out of nothing.[quote]...and the prediction you quoted, has nothing to do with evolution.[/quote]Replier fails to see how this is a fail for and by evolutionists. If you observe Armstrong when he forced the flag into the ground of the moon, he had a little bit of trouble since the scientists at the time stated that the surface was to be soft enough for the flag pole to penetrate. [spoiler]*fail*[/spoiler][quote]The fossil record will never be complete since fossils do not form for every animal in every environmental condition.[/quote]Sure, I'll agree with that excuse. After millions to billions of life existing on our planet, a little less than a thousand can be found for not even one species. How observant sir? How observant?[quote]It takes somewhat specific circumstances for fossilization. So gaps are anticipated.[/quote]How many chances does an organism get to be fossilized after an almost infinite amount of time to be part of some type of sedimentary? Hypothetically speaking.[quote]As for DNA, I don't [b]think[/b] you understand how it works.[/quote]As for that statement, you made no good observation and haven't backed your reasoning with evidence. Thank you for being quite cooperative.