{{
`${userDetail.user.displayName}${userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode ? `#${standardizeBungieGlobalCode(userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode)}` : ""}`}}
{{getUserClans()}}
5/9/2015 8:12:21 PM
1
Yeah, but every time they add new features, they're gonna have to get rid of old ones on last gen consoles. That's the main reason the storage update took so long, because they were deciding which feature would be missed the least.
English
-
Are you on current or last?
-
-
Shouldn't matter then should it? Ps3 is mostly capable to take on what destiny can be. Everyone makes out destiny was supposed to be this amassing thing with open worlds like skyrim but last gen ruined this idea. But that isn't true.
-
Edited by naga007: 5/9/2015 8:23:36 PMI was saying that they are limiting it from becoming better.
-
Edited by NutMeg: 5/9/2015 8:26:37 PMHow much greater can it be? They can't improve the graphics and I doubt they'd make a massive world in the future. And if they did include something that didn't agree with ps3 they can just take it out of last gen and keep it for current
-
It would make adding more cutscenes extremely difficult. And cutscenes (albeit as long as they're skippable) would make this game so much better.
-
Well shit when you put it like that, but the thing is you need ps plus to play destiny in ps4, isn't that 50 quid a month?!
-
I play on Xbox, so I wouldn't know.
