{{
`${userDetail.user.displayName}${userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode ? `#${standardizeBungieGlobalCode(userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode)}` : ""}`}}
{{getUserClans()}}
5/10/2015 7:36:40 PM
8
Bluntest thread ever
This is the thread to bluntly state things. For example, it is in human DNA to mate and have children. So homosexuality is not only a genetic mutation, but a step back in evolution.
-
2 RepliesBlunts are what this person smoked before posting.
-
Beats OP with sword hilt
-
1 ReplyWITH THY NECROMATIC POWERZ I NECROBUMP THEE
-
Edited by Britton: 5/10/2015 9:43:22 PMIts not a genetic mutation, its a developmental mutation that happens during gestation.
-
You could argue it as potentially a natural ingrained form of population control. If a segment of the species is only attracted to the same sex then they aren't going to be reproducing, which would therfore mean a portion of the population is stagnant and therefore not creating more mouths to feed. If homosexuality was partially genetic, then it would be for a reason, as the process of evolution is complex and ever changing. Therefore, I bluntly state that your statement is incorrect.
-
[i] [/i]
-
5 Replies*Hits Blunt*
-
[i] [/i]
