{{
`${userDetail.user.displayName}${userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode ? `#${standardizeBungieGlobalCode(userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode)}` : ""}`}}
{{getUserClans()}}
Edited by Jack:
7/21/2015 8:13:19 AM
404
For those who don't believe in evolution...
It really isn't a debate, evolution is a fact. Its not subject to belief or disbelief, its reality. A scientific theory is a proven hypothesis. Evolution is a theory, just like Gravity, and Cells are "just a theory". Micro and Macro evolution are fake concepts invented by creationists in order to debunk it. Clearly, that did not work. Evolution has been directly observed in animals with short lifespans like fruit flies. If you are going to reject direct, peer reviewed observation, yet trust in the bible, or the Qur'an or any holy book. You are creating a double standard. The burden of proof is on us, and it has been met time and time again.
Edit: Wow 2000 replies that's awesome
Edit: I really love the responses, I can't believe we're over 3000
Edit: I'm gonna rewrite this post as I don't like the message it is portraying and some of the feedback it has received. I just don't personally like how it was wriited and the circumstances it was written in check back in a couple hours for the new one.
-
22 RepliesA. Gravity is a law, not a theory. B. Microevolution has been observed in nature, time and time again. C. There are at least 5, possibly more depending on who you are debating with, other types of evolution, including macroevolution which are still scientifically seen as hypotheses since they have never been seen occur in laboratory or field conditions. D. Science is not something to be handled by someone in an emotional state. It just becomes spittle and drivel coming out of an uninformed mouth. This is not meant to be offensive, it's an observation I have made as a scientist where when someone wants to fight so hard for a point that they ignore the empirical data and/or their own limits. Have a nice day everyone!
