{{
`${userDetail.user.displayName}${userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode ? `#${standardizeBungieGlobalCode(userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode)}` : ""}`}}
{{getUserClans()}}
5/11/2015 8:12:19 PM
2
Both are good in their own rights. I personally prefer the looks on Fatebringer, but WoC IMO is more fun to play with because of its versatility on the second perk slots. Need to reach farther? Okay, cool. Hammer forge. Enemy charging at you constantly? Okay, cool. Speed Reload. Dealing with a sizeable crowd? Okay, cool. Explosive rounds. Notice that if running the latter with FB, it has a chance to mess up the firefly perk, so it's kind of a waste of space. Versatility and being accurate while dumping rounds into your foes makes it the better choice. Only thing that sucks about the WoC is that Void shields are almost non existent. But it's still an elemental primary regardless, and flat out better than Atheon's Epilogue since Auto Rifles sucks atm.
English
-
Lol fatebringer is in the top 5 staple guns easily. It's 1 ghorn 2black hammer 3F bringer 4 ice breaker 5 is tied a lot of ways 4 me Ive even gone so far as to refer to the most common setup as gallahammer. It rolls of the Tongue quite nicely
-
Well I can understand if you refer FB to be an actual staple fun, as in a pea shooter, but why is Gjally on #1 when it's a beast? Do you find the Truth or Hunger of Crota better? I can totally understand HoC being better, it frees up an exotic slot and comes pretty close to the Gjallarhorn. I,m also not a fan of Black Hammer, sure the weapon basically haves infinite ammo if you're accurate, but the impact is shite compared to Icebreaker. IB also has regenerating ammo, better impact, and haves a firefly perk on steroids.
