{{
`${userDetail.user.displayName}${userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode ? `#${standardizeBungieGlobalCode(userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode)}` : ""}`}}
{{getUserClans()}}
5/12/2015 1:07:39 PM
2
That would be true, if it wasn't for the fact that if man had evolved over millions of years, we would have died due to massive amounts of negative mutations
English
-
Uh... No.
-
Do you see Neanderthals? Cross magnon? No? Exactly.
-
Edited by SSG ACM: 5/12/2015 2:17:54 PMWhat determines a mutation a bad mutation if it may be proactive in favor of a species' evolution?
-
If it gives the animal a survival advantage, it'd beneficial. If is doesn't, its not. If its neither, it can still get passed on by shear chance.
-
Yay, I'm an animal.
-
Yes, you are.
-
Edited by SSG ACM: 5/12/2015 6:10:20 PMYippee! No morals! Thank you for relieving me of my self-denial and encouraging me to no longer follow the obviously justified reasoning of an infinite being requiring righteous cooperation. Gracias!
-
That's quite an illogical leap. But sure, think what you want
-
Britton quick question. could you think of morals as a more advanced version of instinct given that most animals only kill out of survival necessity?
-
Basically. What's "right" and "wrong" is something animals have to have a basic concept of. If something attacks a mothers young, that's bad, so the mother acts accordingly. Our higher cognitive ability means that right and wrong for us is simply a matter of our increased intellectual perception.
