Haha I just read the spoiler. It's just an article by an apologetic you've copied on here?! That would explain how your previous response to me was so nonsensical, after the article could at least string an argument together (no matter how flawed). I thought that was weird. So I understand now that it's not you being dishonest, it's the author of this article. I would put money on the fact that he knew he was being disingenuous when he wrote that, but that it suited his purpose to misrepresent the argument. It's rather sad that people are lying to you so blatantly, and sadder still that you are on the Internet with so much information available and still trust such a dubious source. I'm going to look up this guy's qualifications.