{{
`${userDetail.user.displayName}${userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode ? `#${standardizeBungieGlobalCode(userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode)}` : ""}`}}
{{getUserClans()}}
5/18/2015 8:43:30 AM
2
But they're neccessities in a modern first world. Perhaps in somewhere uncivilised and lawless like somalia, chad or kurdistan. But any country claiming to be "first world" shouldnt require the populace to arm themselves to be safe.
My country was, and always has been safe, therefore no need for firearms outside of primary production pest control and sports shooters who have a legitimate need, and are required to keep them locked in a safe when not in use.
English
-
Ham, don't bother trying to reason with Cam. It's a waste of time.
-
No, even in the modern world, or 5,000 years from now, you can survive perfectly fine without even being able to speak at all. It doesn't matter how safe you think an area is, crime can happen anywhere. I lived in a darn good neighborhood and was a victim of a home invasion. Protecting yourself is and always will be vital. Sounds like you're from that country that has far more violence than the United States.
