Well, we got into an interesting discussion but my android phone doesn't show all the thread in the right order, making it incredibly hard to navigate. I am sure I have missed a reply or two of yours. So far everything you've said has been an apologetic argument I have heard before that has had no impact on our understanding of evolution. The original copied and pasted article did nothing to change our understanding of evolution when it was published, and I wonder why you think it might now. It was not seen as a legitimate challenge to the mountains of data in support of evolution. Why do you think this is?