"The same reason why people didn't believe in God 2,000 years ago" was not a satisfying answer?
English
-
No it certainly wasn't. You didn't even provide an answer, you gave a cryptic reply so I would have to ask a further question in order to get a real answer. It's almost as if you just want to waste as much of my time as possible.
-
Hello?
-
Point proven I guess. Anyone reading this should know that you aren't attempting a proper discourse. You should be ashamed of yourself for deliberately wasting my time.
-
What are you talking about?
-
Edited by SSG ACM: 5/21/2015 1:40:17 AMSorry, wasting your time is not my intention. I thought you were going to provide an answer as to why the OP apparently didn't make any sense to you, and to some, it did. My most bias response would be "Because you're stubborn," but I don't want to be bias, so I wanted to know what was your opinion to the question. That is why I said, "I don't know." The most natural response would be an answer.
-
Because the entire thing is basically a strawman argument. If you can present a case that doesn't contain any fallacies it might help.