Is there something else you would like to recommend? The Bible's canonicity is substantiated.

Well, if you are going to use a source as such, how do you prove it is true?

The Bible, as well as other acclaimed "holy" texts, claim that an infinite being created all that is tangible, everything we can sense. Everything that exists required a cause since all that we know exists is finite, and finite things apparently require an infinite cause to even have the possibility of existing. The second law of thermodynamics explains that any system left to itself is left to entropy, chaos, disorder, or anarchy. So in the beginning, everything that had existed must have been genetically perfect (why: we possess inherently bad mutation). The Bible also dictates that even down to the geology of the earth and the biology of humans, we were different than what we are now. Evolution confirms this, but it proceeds to not even explain our sudden appearance into existence, skipping to the part about existing. Why: Because we honestly don't know. That's why the study about its origin is separated into a different study called abiogenesis, a theory used to support an acclaimed scientific theory, evolution. Because the cause is required, a god would account for our irreducible complexity, organic manifestation, need for intelligence,and sudden origins. Abiogenesis has yet to theorize an answer how. Which religion is true? Answer: Origin, Dogma, and Hypocrisy. The origin of the religion must originate from a non-selfish origins proceeding to a non-selfish end. Biblical studies not only illustrate to a primitive people how we came into being: God created everything (Genesis 1:1; John 1:1), but it also teaches that the dogma of Christianity is the only religion that proceeds to teach it's true followers to seek not a state of self-fulfillment but a state of self-denial. The Bible was not written by men because it has never seek to appease men. Often, biased atheists assumed that it was written by men just because (they have no reason).[spoiler]Sometimes I even assume that they would have believed the Bible to be true if it was floating in the air or if it glowed in the dark to show that it was written by something other than human...[/spoiler]...but it's dogma teaches that it was written by men endowed by God's Holy Spirit, which not only degrades men to submission, but it also calls for every true believer to submit to the showing of care, compassion, and love for his neighbor. The theology teaches that man, including it's writers, are nothing that deserves it's own existence, but a "way" has been established to justify living; thus, it wasn't written by men because of its lack of appeasement to men. The Bible also goes into deep theology regarding the unsaved, the unsaved unaware of God or His Word, the dying young, and prophetic events, which haven't reached a fallacy. There are certain denominations or overt religions that add to the Bible's canonicity only to appease their own doctrine, or promote their own lifestyle, or to prove their own deity. Deciding between the truth and error is the most difficult part. There's more information that can be placed, but I think this will get to the point of being TL; DR.

Ok

No other questions?

you bumping Mother-blam!-er