[quote]I got to the part where you said evolution is "cyclical (back and forth)" and stopped reading.[/quote]Ignorance.[quote]You quite obviously do not understand evolution at the fundamental level if you think it is cyclical.[/quote]Evidential statement demonstrates reader refuses to read evidence.[quote]Evolution marches in one direction: forward, unto fitness. It is not cylical.[/quote]Unless...read OP.[quote]Is it [an] indisputable fact?[/quote]...yes, with errors. Fixed and bumped.[quote]No, of course not. That's what makes it a theory:[/quote]It's not a fact because it's a theory. You are the first individual to tell me that.[quote]...it is, by definition, disputable and open to refinement...[/quote]Hence, the debate.[quote]...when we have gleaned the requisite knowledge (unlike dogma), but it's the best damn explanation for how genetics change in populations overtime...[/quote]Replier thinks some "holy" text talks about change of genetics in populations over time.[quote]...and it's been replicated in labs under controlled conditions, as well as being observed across many species in nature.[/quote]Yet, still refuses to read the OP. Blatant ignorance.[quote]Thankfully, science doesn't give a shit...[/quote]Cussing.[quote]...about your personal beliefs.[/quote]Bigotry.[quote]It is true whether you believe it or not.[/quote]Agreed.[quote]The explanations may change...[/quote]What the...?[quote]...but the underlying systems and phenomenon, they try to explain are unwavering...[/quote]...in a wavering pool of misinformation.

Evolution is not cyclical. If you have evidence for it being that way, please share it. Otherwise abandon your incorrect assumption.

I already showed you the evidence.

No, you showed me evidence for standard genetic variation. You have shown no evidence for cyclical progression of evolution. Nothing supports that at all.

Can anyone say, "Denial of evidence is denied"?