[quote]I got to the part where you said evolution is "cyclical (back and forth)" and stopped reading.[/quote]Ignorance.[quote]You quite obviously do not understand evolution at the fundamental level if you think it is cyclical.[/quote]Evidential statement demonstrates reader refuses to read evidence.[quote]Evolution marches in one direction: forward, unto fitness. It is not cylical.[/quote]Unless...read OP.[quote]Is it [an] indisputable fact?[/quote]...yes, with errors. Fixed and bumped.[quote]No, of course not. That's what makes it a theory:[/quote]It's not a fact because it's a theory. You are the first individual to tell me that.[quote]...it is, by definition, disputable and open to refinement...[/quote]Hence, the debate.[quote]...when we have gleaned the requisite knowledge (unlike dogma), but it's the best damn explanation for how genetics change in populations overtime...[/quote]Replier thinks some "holy" text talks about change of genetics in populations over time.[quote]...and it's been replicated in labs under controlled conditions, as well as being observed across many species in nature.[/quote]Yet, still refuses to read the OP. Blatant ignorance.[quote]Thankfully, science doesn't give a shit...[/quote]Cussing.[quote]...about your personal beliefs.[/quote]Bigotry.[quote]It is true whether you believe it or not.[/quote]Agreed.[quote]The explanations may change...[/quote]What the...?[quote]...but the underlying systems and phenomenon, they try to explain are unwavering...[/quote]...in a wavering pool of misinformation.