JavaScript is required to use Bungie.net

Forums

originally posted in: I am an avid Christian; AMA
5/28/2015 9:03:35 AM
4
In a way it does. If a theory contradicts the bible, then it is saying that what the bible says isn't true. So I can either disregard it, or I can say "Hey, your theory is interesting but I think something may be a little off because it doesn't mesh with the bible at all and contradicts what it says." But of course scientists won't do that. Therefore I am more interested in bible-friendly theories. And there are many Christian scientists who have theories, but they are simply just way less popular than the others.
English

Posting in language:

 

Play nice. Take a minute to review our Code of Conduct before submitting your post. Cancel Edit Create Fireteam Post

  • I can't think of many theories, or possible theories that would discredit the bible other than a theory that explicitly does so. Theories like evolution and the Big Bang in no way discredit the bible.

    Posting in language:

     

    Play nice. Take a minute to review our Code of Conduct before submitting your post. Cancel Edit Create Fireteam Post

  • 1
    Im going to reply to you and Quasi both to make sure you see this... A very interesting book on this topic is "The science of God" by Gerald Schroeder. Worth reading even if its a few years old

    Posting in language:

     

    Play nice. Take a minute to review our Code of Conduct before submitting your post. Cancel Edit Create Fireteam Post

  • The best way to reconcile scientific theories, the highest level an explanation can attain, with the bible is to take into context the knowledge available to those who wrote the bible. Or, more simply, its metaphorical.

    Posting in language:

     

    Play nice. Take a minute to review our Code of Conduct before submitting your post. Cancel Edit Create Fireteam Post

  • I have felt this to be true through out the bible, that it was attempting to handle and explain some very heavy philosophical and/or scientific theories but had to be written/passed orally in a fashion that the people of the times could understand. For an easy example revelations, some of the beast sound very much like war machines that we could identify easily but through the eyes of a person with no knowledge of such devices.

    Posting in language:

     

    Play nice. Take a minute to review our Code of Conduct before submitting your post. Cancel Edit Create Fireteam Post

  • Edited by QuasiMixture: 5/28/2015 9:11:55 AM
    You visited my latest thread. Disregarding the theory isn't a good way to go. Regarding Christian scientists, a lot of the evidence that they put forth goes very well with what the bible says and is scientifically sound. Sadly, people think that popularity equals validity.

    Posting in language:

     

    Play nice. Take a minute to review our Code of Conduct before submitting your post. Cancel Edit Create Fireteam Post

  • 1
    Im going to reply to you and recoil both to make sure you see this... A very interesting book on this topic is "The science of God" by Gerald Schroeder. Worth reading even if its a few years old.

    Posting in language:

     

    Play nice. Take a minute to review our Code of Conduct before submitting your post. Cancel Edit Create Fireteam Post

  • I'm not much of a reader but I'll try to take a look at a synopsis of it at least.

    Posting in language:

     

    Play nice. Take a minute to review our Code of Conduct before submitting your post. Cancel Edit Create Fireteam Post

You are not allowed to view this content.
;
preload icon
preload icon
preload icon