{{
`${userDetail.user.displayName}${userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode ? `#${standardizeBungieGlobalCode(userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode)}` : ""}`}}
{{getUserClans()}}
6/4/2015 12:12:42 AM
11
I don't mind if they nerf it.
I'm just worried it'll be another SUROS/Auto rifle situation.
If you all haven't noticed, Bungie has no idea how to balance weapons in destiny.
Until they figure it out, i'd rather all weapons go back to the way they were in release to be completely honest.
Then from there, buff weapons to bring them up to par with other weapons instead of just nerfing the most used weapons.
Make all weapons powerful so no weapon is more powerful than the other.
English
-
If you make them all powerful though it just increases the pace of the game, shorter times to kill which would basically make it CoD AW, with a few more abilities. I would say nerf all weapons till they're at a solid three shot headshot kill with primaries. Exotics would just have they're special perks and all. Shotgun range should be diminished so fusion rifles still have a point in the game.
-
So you're saying that increasing the pace of the game is bad...? Most people find that to be better. Alot of people loved Cod 4 and Mw2. What did they have in common? Shorter times to kill. All weapons were usable. You weren't restricted. You could choose your own weapons to fit your own playstyle instead of being forced to use the guns that were better than all other guns. I don't want this to be battlefield. So slow paced. Faster time to kill= Better gameplay IMO. So, make all weapons OP so none are OP in comparison to each other. Let the player pick what they want to use. Don't make a whole class of weapons shoot marshmallows and another class all powerful. Don't make them all shoot marshmellows. That makes it so boring.
-
No. Most of the players of Destiny were Halo players. Halo Reach's fastest kill was 5 shots with a DMR. I don't think Destiny should be that slow, but a balance between it and CoD. Speeding up kill time means less chance for "clutch" moments in crucible. Plus supers wouldn't really have a point the, if the time to kill is so short anyway. Also, if TTK is shorter in crucible then gameplay will be significantly different from PVE
-
Edited by EragonSaphira: 6/4/2015 12:37:49 AMThis isn't CoD or Halo. If you like shorter or longer TTKs switch games. When Bungie nerfed autorifles they said it was because they wanted to keep the game competitive (ie being able to react when under fire, which requires a shorter TTK than CoD) Besides, lowering the TTK would discourage former halo players from continuing the game
-
Actually, It was because of a stupid IB bounty which required an AR.
-
Just making sure, and I wasn't saying it wasn't because of the IB bounty, that might've been part of it, but the notes did say it was for balance
-
I'm sure that they addressed the bounty first then later said it was for balancing.
-
Still, they say that want it balanced, that's my point. Although I agree the old IB bounties were hard
-
Not trying to be a jerk but the patch notes specifically stated that they wanted to keep it balanced
-
You weren't being a jerk about it.
-
That is what most people are worried about I think
