As the title says, should AC stay as a yearly released game, or be spaced out, so developers would have more time to make a good story and a polished game?
When I say space out I mean 2 to 4 years between each other.
-
Assassins creed got boring a long time ago. It's just the same old game mechanics and story repeated ad nauseam. Ubisoft need to either dump it or completely reinvent this franchise.
-
They are currently in development 3 years each... if they had 4 i think it could help them smooth out the bumps...
-
Ubisoft needs to space out. There is no more new fresh things on the gameplay, etc. We need to wait 3 games to see new features. Seriously? The story gets more and more boring because it's always the same reason: revenge. They even delete the present day story that was, for me, one of the most important thing and the force of the games. (I hope they put back in Syndicates after the fail of the acinitiates web site) There is not this war Assassins/Templars like we had in the first three games (except Rogue that had a very good story) But the most important thing: the games are just full of bugs. It looks like Ubisoft don't test their games anymore I hope Syndicates will be better than Unity but I doubt it. Ubi$oft cares more about money than making a good game
-
It would probably help to space out and have better writers for the games. Don't care much for the franchise though.
-
Edited by CrimsonIXEspada: 6/4/2015 10:51:54 PMUbisoft has stated they have enough material to do many more AC games. And I am a huge fanboy of the franchise. Overall, it's my 4th favorite franchise. That being said, I want it to come to a definite end. Something that ends whatever fučking conflict is going on in the modern day. The lines between Assassin and Templar couldn't be more blurred and I disliked the way certain games were handled. Sadly at this point, it's Ubisoft's cash grab. As the setting of each game gets more and more caught up to modern times, it should end. With the final installment taking place fully in the 2010's. No more Animus. No more flashbacks. I believe it was the Assassins Creed III Desmond Missions that brought to life what it would be like if they would make a full AC Game set in the 2010's and it was done nicely imo, even though ACIII as a whole was meh at best. That also being said, Watchdogs is basically just that.. but less.. Assassins Creed-like if that makes sense. The fact that Watchdogs takes place in the same universe and involves the same characters is cool but not really the Assassins Creed Game I want in it's finale; if that ever comes. Anywho, rambling aside, I want the AC Franchise to end soon. By soon, I mean I want one or two more games after Syndicate and that's it. An end to an overall good-not-great franchise that wraps up the Assassin-Templar War, First Civilization, Abstergo, etc.
-
i would like them to make something different, and not to be limited by assassins, history, same mechanics etc... something futuristic maybe, more creative freedom, yes?
-
They should fix the original game and actually make it fun for longer then 10 minutes. They better not touch AC2 though, that was a masterpiece.
-
space out the series has potential now it is just the same thing over and over.
-
'Space Out' - It's a good/great series, I just think Ubisoft releases them too quickly.
-
Assassins creed had a good run but has lost my interest
-
I think they should do a WW1 game and then finish up the franchise, because anything past that and weapons and tech just becomes way to advanced for it to be fun
-
If Fallout 4 is amazing (Which it will be) then Developers can learn a thing or two from BGS...
-
I would like them to release a game focusing solely on the multiplayer. Sort of an ongoing project as the series slowly dies down.
-
Edited by Doc: 6/4/2015 9:12:31 PMSame stuff every year, I don't even think it should space out, just end the franchise, I'd make exceptions for games that are really captivating but AC has run its course.