Fair enough, I'm in no position to say your moral truth is in any way, shape, or form less true or valid. I particularly don't suggest that you believe it's all [i]guys [/i]that are the problem. You specifically mention '[i]people[/i] like you'. Just purely for me there's a entire universe of difference between the '[i]lack of regard for other people's emotions[/i]' Nightcrawlur404 allegedly displayed by knocking up the nanny, and someone else who 'lacks regard for other people's emotions' by burning children to death because their parents talk to the wrong God. When I try and find a commonality between Nightcrawlur404 who had consensual sex with someone he should not of, aaaaand....who do we have that genuinely wants to destroy an entire civilisation.....let say Abubakar Shekau, leader of Boko Haram.... I come up short. That very likely reflects my own lack of imagination and small scope of thought than any shortcoming on your part. So old Mr Abubakar Shekau, [i]as salamu aleiykum[/i], killed 13 thousand people, displaced a million more, and has a habit of collecting schoolchildren like they were Pokemon. I think we can quite safely say that [i]people like[/i] [him] [i]are why this world is a horrible place[/i] But with your entirely valid and unimpeachable right to a personal moral compass, you point out that Nightcrawlur404 and Mr Shekau belong in the same category. To me, and my limited view and comprehension, that seem as uninformative as saying that 'There wouldn't be any bad if bad people didn't do bad stuff'. And I'm just not mentally equipped to make use of that profound level of insight.