{{
`${userDetail.user.displayName}${userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode ? `#${standardizeBungieGlobalCode(userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode)}` : ""}`}}
{{getUserClans()}}
6/18/2015 11:29:02 PM
6
So you accept micro-evolution but not macro-evolution, despite mountains of evidence. That's merely silly. Clearly you're smarty enough to grasp the concept, I don't see why you'd deny such.
English
-
This is really the generic evolutionist counter argument. I've heard it hundreds of times, but I've never actually heard any proof
-
What would you like for proof?
-
Literally anything that supports it
-
Edited by Britton: 7/11/2015 9:43:03 PM[url=https://www.bungie.net/en/Forum/Post/121194796/0/0]Evolution Explained[/url] [url=https://www.bungie.net/en/Forum/Post/107701125/0/0]evidence for evolution[/url] That's two posts I've made on the subject. Evolution is simply a change in gene frequency across a population of organisms. When a population of organisms gene frequency has changed to the point where they can no longer produce fertile offspring with others, then speciation has occurred, and we have a new species. The difference between the new species and the one it diverged from, will be minimal. However as this process continually occurs due to a multitude of reasons over millions of years, the consistent branching out, as well as often the extinction of the parent species, will results in a very diverse biome. Some examples http://blogs.scientificamerican.com/science-sushi/evolution-watching-speciation-occur-observations/ http://www.talkorigins.org/faqs/faq-speciation.html I go over evolution pretty thoroughly without being too long winded in the threads I linked. So if if you have a question, see if I've already addresses it there. But please, if you have a question or need further clarification, ask.
-
Exactly.
-
I don't know what side your on or what side you think I'm on. This reply is nearly generic, but it does exhibit intelligence concerning micro and macro-evolution.
