{{
`${userDetail.user.displayName}${userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode ? `#${standardizeBungieGlobalCode(userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode)}` : ""}`}}
{{getUserClans()}}
6/23/2015 8:58:28 PM
1
average at best is fine, we never paid anything into PSN, thats the point.
English
-
So your saying you'd rather have a " average at best " free service, than a decent working service that you have to pay £30 ( $45 ) for? Ok......
-
no, im saying you paid that money and it still doesnt prevent your servers from being taken out in a hack, so all that money did was allow microsoft to get their servers back up faster, do you think thats worth a minimum million users at $60 per year over 10 years? i cant imagine that is acceptable to you
-
" paying money only allowed them to get their servers up faster " Yes then I'm happy. Plus we don't go offline for maintenance.. I can't image your happy paying money when you can't get online...?
-
doesnt bother me one bit, im at work and if i cant play video games for a day, my life doesnt end, however, if i was putting my money into something that was just as easily attacked as the servers where people havent paid as much money as me for not 1/10 the amount of time i had been, that would upset me
-
Why do you keep bringing hacking up??!?? Connection wise Xbox live is better, regardless of hacking. Look your clearly a PS fanboy, whatever I say I'm going to be wrong, your opinion your allowed one yada yada. Let's just leave it at that.
-
Xbox live was never hacked.
-
1 million users minimum paying $60 per year over 10 years and you think its acceptable that Microsoft can be hacked just as easily as PSN? tell me more about how i am a fanboy lmfao
-
look youre clearly an xbox fanboy and cannot comprehend that you wasted your money, i get it, lets just leave it at that
-
Wasted my money on...? I'm no fan boy.I own both systems. Scroll up, I admit ps has better specs and output. I just think XBL is better.
