{{
`${userDetail.user.displayName}${userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode ? `#${standardizeBungieGlobalCode(userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode)}` : ""}`}}
{{getUserClans()}}
6/28/2015 7:05:07 PM
2
Actually the spinosaurus would win. They did walk on all fours but more like a gorilla because they weighed so much. It could tear up and grab the tyrannosaur's neck and shove it's weight on its next thus killing the tyrannosaur. It was also 10 ft longer
English
-
Yet, it was slower, much slower and walked on all fours. If the T-rex were able to push it onto it's back, it's spines would shatter and it would die. The only way the Spinosaurus would win is if it could latch onto the T-rex and the T-rex doesn't thrash around. Outside of that it's pretty one sided. Another point is that T-rex teeth were meant for tearing at flesh and splitting bones, while Spinosaurus teeth were more suited to fishing. The Spinosaurus would also win if the battle took place in water, since they were partially aquatic. But I'm assuming this battle takes place on land.
-
The Tyrannosaurus Rex's teeth were bone crushing not skin slicing. And spinosaurus was actually not particularly aquatic that is just a myth Jurassic park 3 used to make it more suspenseful. Along with the fact that t-Rex was more like a semi truck. Either way, we only have fossils to tell us about them not action packed movies. A pack of allasaurs or deinonychus would destroy them both
-
I believe it's 12 ft longer to be precise and I just go with these people because I don't have to to fight over something that we know almost nothing about
-
Fair point
