{{
`${userDetail.user.displayName}${userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode ? `#${standardizeBungieGlobalCode(userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode)}` : ""}`}}
{{getUserClans()}}
6/29/2015 2:49:56 PM
1
What about that poor asshole who hasn't been able to amass as many? Why can't he have the opportunity to pick up another 1 or 2 every couple of weeks? Would that break the game? I don't think so.
English
-
It wouldn't break the game. I just don't think getting etheric light is very hard.
-
Seriously, good for you. I mean that honestly. But there are players out there who haven't been as fortunate. And since this wouldn't flood the market it may just help those players having a harder time. It makes them more competitive in the end game content, which helps the rest of the players, and it encourages grinding in content that rewards vanguard/crucible makes. It seems like a win-win-win to me.
-
I think selling it would help those players who keep getting kicked from 34 and 35 poe because they can't reach Lvl 34. Many players won't let you play with them if you are not Lvl 34.
-
A lot of players won't let you join unless you've got Gjallarhorn. I've also advocated for Xur selling Gjallarhorn as this one weapon has hugely divided this player base, which is mother-blam!-ing silly.
-
I agree. I actually would prefer if more players had Gjallarhorn. It would make pve easier.
