{{
`${userDetail.user.displayName}${userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode ? `#${standardizeBungieGlobalCode(userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode)}` : ""}`}}
{{getUserClans()}}
6/29/2015 4:38:16 PM
1
Original post. Yeah I do. And it's not an idiotic comparison. I took the main elements the games incorporated, especially the open world and immersive story aspect, and stated the simple fact that witcher 3 did it much better and ran circles around destiny. I'm not saying that it is prettier or the story is more interesting even though it is, I just simply stated that witcher has more content in 10 minutes than destiny did in my 500 hours
English
-
Is Destiny a FPS? Yes. No one will disagree. Is Witcher a FPS? Nope. No one will disagree. Is an FPS one of the VERY MAIN GAME GENRES? Yes. No one will disagree. Hence, you lose and look stupid in the process. Go back to changing the fry oil, smegma boy. Pwned.
-
You're an idiot. I'm not comparing genres and if you think RPGs are lower than FPS, then you're simple
-
No, I do not want fries with that.
