{{
`${userDetail.user.displayName}${userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode ? `#${standardizeBungieGlobalCode(userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode)}` : ""}`}}
{{getUserClans()}}
7/17/2015 7:31:49 AM
7
The solution to weapons rebalancing
So everyone is going on about the weapons rebalancing. The way I see it is that the solution is too have different setups for PvP and PvE. A buff or a nerf to a gun can mean it is better for PvE but terrible for pvp. Why not have 2 different setups for both pvp and PvE? Keep everyone happy. I never play pvp, as an example the nerf to the blackhammer means im not going too enjoy it as much now in PvE, but I can sort of see why its been done for pvp. weapon rebalancing will always be a tricky subject, but bungie are going about this in the wrong way.
-
Gjallarhorn has needed a nerf for a long time and should have never been in the game the way it was. No one weapon should ever have 4 times the damage of all of the other weapons in it's class. But the changes to Ice Breaker and Black Hammer have made them both completely not worth using. What they should have done was buffed both of them: Black Hammer's ammo reserve should have been increased to 21 rounds instead of 15 and Ice Breaker's ammo reserve should have been increased to 8 rounds instead of six.
