{{
`${userDetail.user.displayName}${userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode ? `#${standardizeBungieGlobalCode(userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode)}` : ""}`}}
{{getUserClans()}}
7/20/2015 11:00:44 AM
2
That is an incredibly long reply to a thread that if you had done even a moments research...IE clicked the link you would have seen that Fox News in fact created no such article and that this thread was designed originally as a rick roll......
English
-
Dude I clicked the link, regardless of the validity of this particular article does not change my argument, they have a tendency to publish similar shit all the time.
-
it doesnt realy matter if a rick roll video was posted with it the fact is that fox news would most likely write an article like this thats why people are posting cause it is absolutely believable that they could do this lol
-
However you missed the entire point. The fact that you state your belief as to whether fox news would write such an article completely misses the point that they did in fact not write such an article. Meaning that instead of using your brain to actually weigh the available information and then proceed appropriately.....instead the OP used your personal preconceived notions based on your limited, biased opinions that you hold regarding this agency. So based on your statement if anyone tells you anything you don't agree with as long as they tell you its coming from a company/organization you do not like you will instantly believe it is true? Especially when a quick 1 minute attempt to research it will yield the correct information? This is such a major problem with kids these days. They accept everything as they are told and cannot even comprehend the fact that someone might actually be lying....or unknowledgeable in what they are telling you. Instead of checking on things yourself you swallow it hook line and sinker. Besides this you stated you accept this as being possible from Fox News yet do you deny that it could just as easily be possible from CNN? You know the news agency that actually spent an entire segment debunking a SNL skit about Obama back in 2009.
-
Not really.....the reason why it works so well it because of peoples erroneous pre conceived notions. When people decide that they dislike something (whether because they have personally researched it or because its just the opinion of those around them that they have assimilated) they tend to believe almost anything that they might consider to be "bad" about that organization whether its true or not. For instance people claim that Fox News is a "terrible" news agency yet many of those same people hold up other news agencies such as MSNBC or CNN as if they are "good" news agencies. When in reality they are at the very minimum no better than Fox News. Because remember we are talking about the "news" divisions of these agencies. The very fact that you have written such a long article with such little thought into actually researching what the OP said is in fact ridiculous to an absolutely stupid measure. While you say well its believable therefore I should believe it.....you realize that other news agencies have done things that are even more outrageous than this article purports. Or have you forgotten years ago when CNN used an entire segment of their show "fact checking" a SNL skit about Obama? Seriously who in their right mind "fact checks" a SNL skit.........
-
This guy.... I tell anyone who watches any news source they are wasting their time. Read a paper or do a quick internet scan The news is 80% negativity.
-
Yea if you watch the news you have to take what they say with a grain of salt. Understanding that by and large they only tell you the news that they think will generate the most viewers. Which is why sometimes there are big news items that day but instead the national news focuses on something stupid....like Bruce Jenners sex change operation.......
