{{
`${userDetail.user.displayName}${userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode ? `#${standardizeBungieGlobalCode(userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode)}` : ""}`}}
{{getUserClans()}}
Edited by Semperfi1999:
7/20/2015 11:27:02 AM
1
Not really by that argument then Fox News should have in fact written this article yet they did not. So therefore your conclusion is invalid because one of your initial premises is invalid. If even 1 premise is invalid your conclusion is completely invalid and you must throw out your conclusion....that or your arguments do not follow logical reasoning. In which case means that your comments are less than irrelevant.
The fact that you feel you have to defend yourself from being so badly rick rolled is just hilarious to me. Accept it like a man (or woman) and acknowledge you were completely taken in by the OP without even looking.
English
-
Edited by DwoodOne: 7/20/2015 1:54:12 PMOk if rick rolling is your thing, then I was "got, had, or whatever". Better? Btw: I didn't even read the post. I like logic too, so here is my take. Nowhere did I reference the story. I was referring to Fox News Scare stories in general, which is why I said "any" Fox News Scare story. Since the article in the OP was not legit (i.e. not a Fox News story) then my statement isn't built on a fake premiss and thus remains valid. Of course, I guess I should have included #sarcasm Semper Fi Devil Dog
-
So basically your saying that you made a statement regarding Fox News Scare stories in general on a topic that referenced a fake Fox News story but you were not including the fake Fox News story in your comment. So your comment in relation to the topic is more of an off topic remark regarding another aspect of Fox News as you see it rather than regarding the specific topic at hand. LOL that's kind of a humorous way of looking at it. Oh well....its still funny how many people in these forums have fallen for this 3 times now.
