Not really by that argument then Fox News should have in fact written this article yet they did not. So therefore your conclusion is invalid because one of your initial premises is invalid. If even 1 premise is invalid your conclusion is completely invalid and you must throw out your conclusion....that or your arguments do not follow logical reasoning. In which case means that your comments are less than irrelevant. The fact that you feel you have to defend yourself from being so badly rick rolled is just hilarious to me. Accept it like a man (or woman) and acknowledge you were completely taken in by the OP without even looking.