{{
`${userDetail.user.displayName}${userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode ? `#${standardizeBungieGlobalCode(userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode)}` : ""}`}}
{{getUserClans()}}
Edited by DwoodOne:
7/20/2015 1:54:12 PM
1
Ok if rick rolling is your thing, then I was "got, had, or whatever".
Better?
Btw: I didn't even read the post.
I like logic too, so here is my take.
Nowhere did I reference the story. I was referring to Fox News Scare stories in general, which is why I said "any" Fox News Scare story. Since the article in the OP was not legit (i.e. not a Fox News story) then my statement isn't built on a fake premiss and thus remains valid. Of course, I guess I should have included #sarcasm
Semper Fi Devil Dog
English
-
So basically your saying that you made a statement regarding Fox News Scare stories in general on a topic that referenced a fake Fox News story but you were not including the fake Fox News story in your comment. So your comment in relation to the topic is more of an off topic remark regarding another aspect of Fox News as you see it rather than regarding the specific topic at hand. LOL that's kind of a humorous way of looking at it. Oh well....its still funny how many people in these forums have fallen for this 3 times now.
