The OP is a well reasoned post with plenty of evidence, quantitative and qualitative, to back it up. there is nothing subjective about it at all really. I wish there were some chinks in this argument that i could pry apart but there aren't! the Op has battered down the walls of my ignorance with the battering ram of his pure and unfiltered logic. he has absolutely forced me to if not accept his extremely valid and well reasoned arguments about The 'Taken King' at least consider them very strongly. I've heard a lot of people saying that 'The Taken King' is not worth the money but they hadn't convinced me in the slightest but the op contains an expertly designed thesis it's short, sweet, and cuts straight to the point avoiding unnecessary pleasantries of language. just when the op has you right where it wants you questioning everything you take to be true about 'The Taken King' it hits you with unrelenting Ad Hominem. that smallest garnish of Ad Hominem driving home what the reader knows to be true, this final piece perfectly punctuating it's authors intent [i]"'The Taken King' Truly is not worth the money"[/i]. A truly magnificent display of argument, a master class, and even that i fear is damning it with faint praise. Indeed Voltaire nor Vonnegut could've so artfully written such a scathing criticism of the state of the games industry.