{{
`${userDetail.user.displayName}${userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode ? `#${standardizeBungieGlobalCode(userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode)}` : ""}`}}
{{getUserClans()}}
8/6/2015 8:02:13 AM
1
A guardian wouldn't be able to have a super because it would have to charge. Seeing how there is a fairly long charge on a super we could bet that a guardian wouldn't have a chance to use it before the fight is over. Although, I still believe the armory of a guardian doesn't make them capable of taking Master Chief. If you've read the books (which I hope you have) you'd know that he is certainly an above average Spartan whereas a causal guardian is simply a guardian. Nothing more, nothing less. Chief excels where others don't and is able to think quicker and react faster than most. Plus, with Cortana by his side I don't see how a ghost could ever provide enough intel to get the upper hand.
English
-
But lore wise, supers don't charge, they recharge. And if their both coming in fully equipped, then it makes sense that the guardian would have everything at his disposal.
-
A guardian doesn't walk into any area with their super fully charged, they have to charge it themselves. Nowhere in-game does a guardian spawn with full super energy so it would only make sense they don't in this scenario. If anything, the should be using whatever they normally would use in-game. Chief an Assault Rifle and a guardian would be more miscellaneous.
-
Can chief flip elephants in lore?
-
What does that have to do with anything exactly?
-
I was trying to make the point that lore and gameplay aren't always the same. Lore wise, it's pretty obvious that guardians would have the upper hand. But gameplay wise, chief probably has an advantage.
![[CuCh] Seagebs](/img/profile/avatars/a_reach_13.gif?cv=3983621215&av=3129039522)
