{{
`${userDetail.user.displayName}${userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode ? `#${standardizeBungieGlobalCode(userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode)}` : ""}`}}
{{getUserClans()}}
8/6/2015 12:49:51 PM
1
You know when H&K came out with the VP9, I didn't throw away my old USPs and Mark 23. Would you? Or would you expand?
When Sig Sauer came out with the MK25, I didn't throw away my old P226's.
When the military readopted the 1911 .45 ACP, did that make my M9 less useful? No.
Were there better weapons that came out? Sure, does that mean I want throw away old ones? No. Why can't I expand with the times? Is choice a bad thing? I like choices.
English
-
I've no clue what you're talking about m8.
-
The new gun collection should not mean throwing away your old one. Expansion should not be replacement. Expansion implies adding to, not taking away. Normally, we do not do this in real life. Why, in a virtual world, where space isn't real, would we HAVE to make a decision of what to throw away (dismantle) and what NOT to throw away? Could you imagine if John Browning didn't design the 1911 as efficiently as he did? It is over 100 years old, and still used today. Surely weapons forged by light should be useful for more than 3 months.
