JavaScript is required to use Bungie.net

Forums

8/7/2015 1:13:18 AM
1
I almost agree. I mean, if they start now, they set a precedent that will be impossible to deal with later on down the road. This is a 10 year game for Bungie, and that needs to be kept in mind. They already said they're introducing more new weapons here than they ever will before. I didn't mean to imply that saturation would occur after year two, but after a while, you have too many options if everything ever made is still viable. This makes the decision between something mean less. Every game designer ever will always tell you they'd prefer you to be forced into making a meaningful decision that you don't want to have to make rather than just giving you what you want all the time.
English

Posting in language:

 

Play nice. Take a minute to review our Code of Conduct before submitting your post. Cancel Edit Create Fireteam Post

  • I would agree with you if old gear was still obtainable [i]after[/i] a new DLC comes out, which isn't the case. There will always be a finite amount of space that organically forces players to get rid of older gear at some point, and the situation you're bringing up could only happen if players hoarded ONE type of weapon for 2-3 years. It's not going to be an issue, man. :P

    Posting in language:

     

    Play nice. Take a minute to review our Code of Conduct before submitting your post. Cancel Edit Create Fireteam Post

  • Players will naturally horde the best, whatever that is. I'm not saying this is going to happen. It will only happen if they allowed carryover. Which they shouldn't allow.

    Posting in language:

     

    Play nice. Take a minute to review our Code of Conduct before submitting your post. Cancel Edit Create Fireteam Post

You are not allowed to view this content.
;
preload icon
preload icon
preload icon