See, this is where I think we end up disagreeing. You don't need Ground Zeroes to get the full experience of MGSV, it's little more than a prologue. Destiny however, given it's nature, almost requires you to buy the DLC if you want to keep playing. You can skip Zeroes and not miss a beat. You can't say the same for TDB, HoW or TTK.
But again I don't think they're all that comparable. One focuses on single player, the other on multiplayer. Destiny releasing DLC isn't a bad thing because they need to keep things fresh, but I think we can both agree that some people don't like having to keep putting money into a game to keep it enjoyable, especially if those people aren't familiar with subscription based MMOs.
English
-
True, I meant it as they're similar in the most basic way, that they're both not worth the money. And by worth I mean the amount of content in it for the price. The DLCs were overpriced and that shouldn't be defended, GZ was overpriced and shouldn't be defended. They're definitely different when you get into more details though. I bring this up mainly because I read the comments for one of bdobbins (a youtuber who goes into the politics of games if you don't know him) and people who commented that they play the game because it's fun to play sign friends get called fanboys and insulted with 20+ comments, then when someone calls destiny trash they get responses that are all agreeing with him. I said that I enjoy playing the game and people said I was the reason that the gaming industry sucks and that I'm supporting bad business. I've just never seen this kind of hate against people before. I don't know if destiny is a special case or something but it's not like other games have lacked content. An example is watchdogs and someone commented that they have fun playing it but nobody cared. They didn't call him a fanboy. It just doesn't make sense