You give no examples or evidence to back up your preposterous claims. I mean, it's not like Internet atheism is going to convince you when common sense has already failed.
English
-
Edited by GR0MS: 8/25/2015 5:15:14 AMThis thread is fraught with evidence for my claim.
-
Oh if only you could see internet theists for what they really are as well. It's always amusing when a camp of people seek flaws in the opposing camp while completely ignoring the flaws of their own.
-
What flaws?
-
Do you think that any one group of like-minded people is flawless? No? Then you agree. I'm not obligated to explain what flaws they have. I'm simply telling you that you refuse to acknowledge them which inevitably lead to this thread. Please try to see the situation from both sides. It'll help you not come off as incredibly biased.
-
There's nothing to acknowledge if you can't name some of these flaws.
-
I only have to name one in order for the group to not be considered flawless: They disregard any other type of deity simply because they were not indoctrinated to believe it when they were young. Why is this flaw from your camp being ignored by you?
-
It's not. I've studied other religions and none of them hold up like Christianity, therefore I reject them.
-
That's just great for you. Notice how I said that the fact they weren't indoctrinated as a child was the reason they rejected all other religions. Please take time to read and understand my comments before responding to them. Now I ask you again: Why is this flaw being ignored by you?
-
Edited by Ninja_90: 8/25/2015 3:54:51 AM[quote]wrought[/quote] I'm sorry but that is some great vocabulary.
-
Wrought...
-
Oops fixed that
-
Actually, thanks. I used the wrong term. Fraught is what it should've been.
-
Lol np.