{{
`${userDetail.user.displayName}${userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode ? `#${standardizeBungieGlobalCode(userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode)}` : ""}`}}
{{getUserClans()}}
8/25/2015 10:53:49 AM
3
I keep reading "Removing choice." By not bringing Gjallarhorn forward into year 2 Bungie is removing choice. But on the other hand if Gjallarhorn moves forward Bungie is again removing choice. Who wants to not use the easy button? It's a no win situation. There will be less bitching if Gjallarhorn moves forward. But then the elitist sect continues with the max Gjallarhorn posts. Either way everyone loses.
English
-
There will always be an Elitist element, if not with demanding Gjallarhorn in LFG etc then it'll be something else... Don't forget that Gjallarhorn is getting a nerf so it was already being brought back into line to an extent. Balance the guns better Bungie, don't just remove their viability in whole Years worth of the game...
-
Gjallarhorn is getting a huge nerf now that's it's going to stay year 1. I know the elite posts will continue but notice everything that's demanded get nerfed the hardest or taken away? We complain about not looking different and not feeling unique. PvE load outs are Ghallarhorn, Black Hammer and Fatebringer. I don't blame people for using them! They're amazing! Way too damned amazing.
-
Personally I couldn't care less about being unique gear-wise. I desire and use whatever kit I feel will get the job done best.
