{{
`${userDetail.user.displayName}${userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode ? `#${standardizeBungieGlobalCode(userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode)}` : ""}`}}
{{getUserClans()}}
8/25/2015 9:03:12 PM
26
The religious abandon all logic if it doesn't fall in line with their faith
English
-
I disagree
-
And atheists deny all evidence if it doesn't fit their presuppositions.
-
Nope! That's why science is always evolving :)
-
I wasn't talking about science. I was talking about how atheists handle any evidence that's presented.
-
It may be because no such evidence has been presented
-
Plenty has been.
-
Nope, you can't prove that under my conditions kek
-
Of course not. Your conditions are a product of your presuppositions.
-
What conclusive and non-ambiguous evidence do you have?
-
I'll refer you to Dr. John Lennox, Dr. Hugh Ross, Dr. Francis Collins, and Dr. David Berlinski for starters.
-
I looked up all 4 and not a single one had a peer reviewed article that I could find, yes they have books but books are opinions and not scientific peer reviewed literature. What you have listed is the equivalent of saying Dawkins, Hutchins, Nye these guys are voices for atheism but I would not consider what they do to be supporting evolution scientifically.
-
What about their research is proof? List their articles where they have tested and proved a hypothesis in support of the bible.
-
Or maybe you could actually do the research yourself...
-
https://yourlogicalfallacyis.com/appeal-to-authority
-
I'm not appealing to their authority, I just don't feel like writing out all the overwhelming evidence for God. Maybe you should stop providing evidence that the op was correct and listen to what they have to say.
-
Also, your people are ancient Christians and Catholics that have a confirmation bias Another logical fallacy
-
Everyone has biases. Your argument is invalid.
-
Your fuсking statement in the OP is literally a subjective p.o.s that is an opinion. It's so retarded that it's ridiculous kek What you did is literally the definition of an appeal to authority, kiddo. Even if it was to shorten it, it was still an appeal to authority
-
Call it what you will. You are trying to find technicalities as a way of avoiding the truth.
-
Your sources are Christians or of that faith branch since childhood lmao They're invalid with confirmation bias, as per the rules of arguments
-
Your sources are not Christian, so they too are biased. Again, you should stop looking at technicalities and start looking for truth.
-
Again with the assumption that you are always and undeniably correct See, my sources aren't biased because I use facts that are of observable and testable nature, and not the quotes of humans that are prone to err. You were the only one here to bring in a person to appeal to an authority. I used things of no bias.
-
[quote]The religious abandon all logic if it doesn't fall in line with their faith[/quote]
-
[quote][quote]The religious abandon all logic if it doesn't fall in line with their faith[/quote][/quote]
-
[quote][quote][quote]The religious abandon all logic if it doesn't fall in line with their faith[/quote][/quote][/quote]
