{{
`${userDetail.user.displayName}${userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode ? `#${standardizeBungieGlobalCode(userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode)}` : ""}`}}
{{getUserClans()}}
Edited by ZigTheZagy:
8/25/2015 5:04:49 AM
384
"No exotics left behind" V3
Well since the V2 post was taken down I am going to make a V3 and see what happens( most likely downvoted to oblivion). Nonetheless I still feel that these posts should continue until the issue of Y1 exotics is discussed in the Weekly Update. I will not be blaming anyone or anything for the current issue at hand nor make any updates about the status of the post to prevent any risk of violation of forum rules. Now as the post suggests this is to bring all year 1 exotics forward into year 2 giving them the same attack and defense values as year 2 exotics. The amount of time us players have put into Destiny to obtain these year 1 exotics should be respected going forward. We should be allowed to have the option to use year 1 exotics, year 2 exotics, or a combination of both. By expanding the pool of exotics the diversity in Destiny will increase allowing more options for players to choose their exotics based on their various playstyles. Like, dislike, bump, sign, or leave a comment of your opinion of whether you are for or against bringing all year 1 exotics to year 2.
-
3 RepliesEh, I get where this is coming from (and think it'll happen eventually), but I feel like we need to start branching out with our gear/weapon variety. If we bring Y1 exotics into Y2, then we'll all probably want Y1 and Y2 exotics in Y3 and Y 1/2/3 in Y4 etc... I for one don't want to be using the same stuff year after year after year. I cringe at the thought of using GHorn in year 10. Hell, I'd hate to be using it in Y3.
